Ball State Cardinals 2026 Defensive Breakdown: Veteran Secondary, Rebuilt Front Seven and 4 Prop Bets

The Ball State Cardinals enter the 2026 college football season hoping the second year of the Mike Uremovich era produces a significant step forward defensively.

Ball State improved to 4-8 overall and 3-5 in the MAC in 2025, but the Cardinals still struggled to consistently stop opposing offenses.

Ball State allowed 29.8 points and 405.7 total yards per game, including 178.8 rushing yards and 226.8 passing yards per contest. Opponents averaged six yards per offensive play and scored 46 offensive touchdowns.

There were positive signs.

The Cardinals produced 23 sacks and nine interceptions, and the defense helped Ball State earn MAC victories over Ohio, Akron and Kent State.

But improvement is necessary.

Ball State allowed at least 31 points in five games and surrendered 42 or more against Auburn, Western Michigan and Miami.

The challenge becomes even greater because the Cardinals must replace their best pass rusher.

Nathan Voorhis, a First-Team All-MAC defensive end, led the conference in sacks during the 2025 season. At one point in November, Voorhis had already accumulated 11 sacks, establishing himself as one of the most disruptive pass rushers in the country.

Replacing that production won’t be easy.

But Ball State isn’t entering the season without defensive building blocks.

Will Yates returns as the team’s most experienced cover corner.

DJ Fields returns after becoming a starter at safety.

Justin Thomas steps into a much larger role at outside linebacker.

Ameir Glenn provides returning production inside.

And the Cardinals added transfers such as Cincear Lewis and Jared Badie to strengthen the front seven. Ball State identified Fields, Yates, Thomas, Glenn, Ben Marsh, Badie and Lewis as players expected to provide defensive stability entering 2026.

The result is a defense with significant questions but considerably more potential than the raw 2025 statistics suggest.

Ball State Cardinals 2026 Defensive Projections

Projected Record: 4-8

Projected Points Allowed Per Game: 27-29

Projected Total Defense: 385-400 yards per game

Projected Rushing Defense: 165-175 yards per game

Projected Passing Defense: 215-225 yards per game

Projected Team Sacks: 25-29

Projected Interceptions: 10-12

Projected Total Takeaways: 17-20

Projected Tackles for Loss: 62-70

Biggest Defensive Strength: Veteran Cornerbacks and Secondary Experience

Biggest Defensive Question: Who replaces Nathan Voorhis as Ball State’s primary pass rusher?

Jeff Knowles’ Ball State Defense

Continuity begins with defensive coordinator Jeff Knowles.

Knowles returns as Ball State’s defensive coordinator and linebackers coach under Uremovich. The two have worked together at several stops during their coaching careers, including Butler before arriving in Muncie.

Knowles has built excellent defenses before.

At Butler, his units ranked among the FCS leaders in red-zone defense, scoring defense and total defense.

His previous Northern Illinois defenses were even more impressive.

NIU’s 2018 defense recorded a school-record 50 sacks, ranked second nationally in sacks, allowed only 2.7 yards per rushing attempt and led the MAC in scoring defense at 20.6 points per game.

The previous Northern Illinois defense led the MAC in both total defense and scoring defense while ranking first nationally in tackles for loss and second in sacks.

That history is encouraging.

Knowles understands how to create pressure.

He understands how to build a front seven.

And Ball State’s defensive structure includes a hybrid “Sniper” position, blending responsibilities traditionally associated with linebackers and safeties.

The problem in 2025 wasn’t necessarily the philosophy.

It was consistency.

Ball State surrendered 178.8 rushing yards per game.

Opponents converted nearly 42% of their third downs.

And the Cardinals allowed 405.7 yards per contest.

Knowles now has another offseason to install the system and considerably more roster depth.

That should matter.

The objective isn’t for Ball State to suddenly become the best defense in the MAC.

It is to become a defense capable of consistently keeping games competitive.

Reducing the average from approximately 30 points allowed to around 27 or 28 would be meaningful progress.

Ball State Defensive Line Breakdown

The defensive line begins with Ameir Glenn.

Glenn transferred from Wake Forest before the 2025 season and immediately earned a rotational role.

The 6-foot-1, 304-pound defensive tackle appeared in all 12 games and recorded 13 tackles, 2.5 tackles for loss and one sack.

Those aren’t enormous numbers.

They are encouraging numbers for a redshirt freshman playing his first meaningful college football.

Now Glenn enters his second season in the system.

Ball State needs him to become more than a rotational piece.

It needs him to become an interior anchor.

Stopping the run is the priority.

The Cardinals allowed 178.8 rushing yards per game and 4.7 yards per rushing attempt last season.

Those numbers put tremendous pressure on the rest of the defense.

When offenses consistently gain four or five yards on first down, Knowles cannot unleash his pressure packages.

Third-and-2 is significantly different from third-and-8.

Glenn’s ability to occupy blockers and generate interior penetration could help change those situations.

Ball State also added more size.

Keilan Smith, a Cincinnati transfer, is listed around 335 pounds.

Reese Hill arrives from Purdue at approximately 300 pounds.

The roster also includes Spencer Vaka, Myles Hancock, Ka’Shawn Thomas, Michael Thacker, Lincoln Mason, Kendrick Gilbert and several young defensive tackles competing for roles.

That gives defensive run-game coordinator and defensive-line coach Adam Siwicki considerably more bodies to rotate. Siwicki has worked with Uremovich since their time together at Butler.

Depth matters.

Ball State doesn’t need Glenn to play 70 snaps every week.

It needs three or four interior defenders capable of remaining fresh and controlling the line of scrimmage.

If that happens, the Cardinals’ linebackers should become considerably more productive.

Projected Ball State Rushing Defense: 165-175 yards per game

Ball State Edge-Rusher Breakdown

This is the biggest question on the entire defense.

How do you replace Nathan Voorhis?

Voorhis developed into one of the country’s most productive pass rushers in 2025 and earned First-Team All-MAC recognition.

There isn’t an obvious player guaranteed to replace his production.

But there are several candidates.

The most intriguing is Justin Thomas.

Thomas spent the 2025 season playing behind Voorhis and appeared in all 12 games.

His Ball State numbers were modest.

Seven tackles.

One tackle for loss.

But his previous production demonstrates significant pass-rushing potential.

At the University of Indianapolis, Thomas accumulated 19.5 tackles for loss and 9.5 sacks over two seasons, including seven sacks and 15.5 tackles for loss during his 2023 season.

Now he gets his opportunity.

Thomas enters 2026 as Ball State’s projected rush outside linebacker and was selected alongside Chris Hood to represent the Cardinals at MAC Football Media Kickoff.

That says something about how the program views him.

Ball State doesn’t need Thomas to become Voorhis.

Expecting another 11-sack season from one defender would be unreasonable.

But four to six sacks from Thomas could dramatically reduce the pressure on everyone else.

Jared Badie provides another option.

Badie transfers from San Diego State after appearing in all 12 games last season and recording eight tackles, 1.5 tackles for loss and half a sack.

Then there is Ben Marsh, a 6-foot-2, 252-pound edge defender returning to the rotation.

The roster also includes George Okorie, Maverick Gracio, Austin Stief, Layton Starks and Sam Feeney as potential edge options.

Knowles may have to replace Voorhis collectively.

Six sacks from Thomas.

Four from another edge defender.

Pressure from linebackers.

Interior sacks from Glenn and the tackles.

That is probably the formula.

Projected Ball State Team Sacks: 25-29

Justin Thomas: Ball State’s Defensive Wild Card

Justin Thomas may be the most important individual projection on Ball State’s defense.

The Cardinals already know he can play.

What they don’t know is whether he can become a featured FBS pass rusher.

Thomas has demonstrated that ability before.

His final season at Indianapolis included 33 tackles, 15.5 tackles for loss and seven sacks, and he finished his two seasons there with 9.5 sacks.

His first opportunity at Ball State was interrupted by a season-ending preseason leg injury in 2024.

Then Voorhis emerged in 2025 and controlled the primary rush role.

Now the opportunity belongs to Thomas.

At 6-foot and approximately 241 pounds, Thomas doesn’t have traditional towering defensive-end dimensions.

His leverage could become an advantage.

He can attack underneath longer offensive tackles.

He has enough experience to understand protection schemes.

And Knowles has a history of developing productive edge rushers.

The ceiling is interesting.

If Thomas becomes a five-or-six-sack player, Ball State’s entire defense changes.

Knowles can bring pressure from other locations without constantly manufacturing the pass rush.

If Thomas struggles to generate pressure, the Cardinals could find it difficult to replace Voorhis’ production.

Justin Thomas Projection: 35-45 tackles, 7-10 tackles for loss and 4-6 sacks.

Ball State Linebacker Breakdown

The linebacker room received one of Ball State’s most important transfer additions.

Cincear Lewis arrives from Cincinnati.

Lewis spent four seasons with the Bearcats and has one season of eligibility remaining.

His previous statistical production isn’t enormous—he recorded 10 tackles in five games for Cincinnati in 2025—but Ball State believes his combination of athleticism, intelligence and experience gives him a chance to immediately start inside.

The level of competition matters.

Lewis spent years practicing and developing inside a Big 12 program.

He has seen Power Four offensive linemen.

He understands faster offensive tempos.

He has played against high-level athletes.

That experience should translate to the MAC.

The question is production.

Lewis hasn’t previously accumulated 80 or 90 tackles in a college season.

Ball State is projecting a much larger role than he had at Cincinnati.

The Cardinals also have Lucas Szymborski competing for significant snaps, along with Gavin Forsha, Kaleb Stewart, Mikeah Webster and several younger linebackers.

The linebackers’ success will be directly connected to the defensive line.

If Glenn, Smith, Vaka and the interior defenders occupy blockers, Lewis can attack the football.

If offensive guards consistently reach the second level untouched, the linebackers will spend too many snaps fighting through 300-pound blockers.

Ball State’s August camp coverage specifically highlighted Knowles, Lewis and Szymborski in its linebacker preview, providing another indication that those players should become central pieces of the 2026 defense.

Cincear Lewis Projection: 65-75 tackles, 5-7 tackles for loss and 1-3 sacks.

Ball State Secondary Breakdown

The secondary is the easiest place to find established Ball State production.

Start with Will Yates.

Yates enters the season as one of Ball State’s most important defenders and has received preseason All-MAC recognition from multiple publications.

He has 12 career starts, 51 career tackles and two career interceptions.

Uremovich has publicly described Yates as Ball State’s best corner because of his ability to cover and tackle.

His 2025 season was particularly encouraging.

Yates recorded 34 tackles and a team-high seven pass breakups despite playing only 10 games.

He started seven games and produced an interception for the second consecutive season.

Those numbers create obvious breakout potential.

If Yates plays 12 games, he could become one of the MAC’s more productive cover corners.

Opposite him, Ball State has several options.

The Cardinals added Chris Jackson from Colorado State.

Jackson appeared in all 12 games for Colorado State last season after previously playing junior-college football in California.

The Cardinals also have Deondre Shepherd, Cedric Franklin II, Anthony Pinnace, Avery Stuart, Quentavius Scandrett, Sterling Smith and other defensive backs competing for roles.

Then there is DJ Fields.

Fields could become the leader of the secondary.

The 6-foot-1 safety appeared in 11 games and made eight starts last season, finishing with 34 tackles.

Ball State expects him to start at field safety and views him as an all-conference candidate entering his junior season.

Fields and Yates are particularly important because they are the two established starters returning from the 2025 defense.

That continuity matters.

Secondary communication can destroy inexperienced defenses.

Yates understands Knowles’ coverage system.

Fields understands it.

They can help organize everyone around them.

Ball State intercepted only nine passes last season.

That number should increase slightly if the pass rush improves and the secondary remains healthier.

Projected Ball State Interceptions: 10-12

Will Yates: Ball State’s Defensive Playmaker

Will Yates has an opportunity to become Ball State’s best defensive back in 2026.

The production already exists.

He has intercepted one pass in each of the last two seasons.

He led Ball State with seven pass breakups last year.

And he accumulated those seven breakups despite missing two games.

The most interesting statistic may be his age and experience.

Yates is only entering his junior season.

This isn’t a sixth-year senior attempting to squeeze out one final productive season.

There may still be substantial development ahead.

His challenge will be opportunities.

As a corner develops a reputation, quarterbacks sometimes stop throwing toward him.

That could reduce interception numbers.

It could also be extremely valuable to the defense.

If Yates effectively removes one side of the field, Knowles can dedicate additional resources elsewhere.

Will Yates Projection: 40-48 tackles, 8-10 pass breakups and 1-3 interceptions.

Four Ball State Cardinals 2026 Defensive Prop Bets

Note: Full-season college football defensive player and team statistical props are not consistently available at every sportsbook. The statistical lines below should therefore be treated as projection-based betting benchmarks rather than claims that every sportsbook currently offers these exact markets.

Prop Bet #1: Ball State Over 24.5 Team Sacks

DraftKings

4.5/5

Tip: Ball State Over 24.5 Team Sacks

• Jeff Knowles’ Pressure History
• Justin Thomas Gets Expanded Role
• Deeper Front Seven

New DraftKings Customer: SPEND $5, GET $200 IN BONUSES

Get bonus now

Why the Over Is a Good Bet

Ball State recorded 23 sacks in 2025.

The Cardinals only need two more to surpass 24.5.

That is achievable even after losing Voorhis.

Knowles has repeatedly produced aggressive pass-rushing defenses throughout his career.

His 2018 Northern Illinois defense recorded 50 sacks and ranked second nationally.

Thomas also presents breakout potential.

He produced 9.5 sacks over two seasons at Indianapolis and now gets the opportunity to become Ball State’s primary rush linebacker.

Badie adds another experienced edge defender.

Glenn already demonstrated some interior pass-rushing ability.

And the Cardinals have enough rotational depth to attack quarterbacks with multiple combinations.

Nobody needs to replace Voorhis’ entire production.

Five defenders producing three to six sacks could get Ball State comfortably into the upper 20s.

Why the Under Is a Good Bet

The Voorhis loss can’t be minimized.

He wasn’t simply Ball State’s best pass rusher.

He was one of the MAC’s best defensive players.

There is no returning defender with proven FBS production approaching his.

Thomas recorded only seven tackles last season.

Badie had half a sack at San Diego State.

Glenn had one.

That means much of the Over argument depends upon projection.

Ball State also opens against Ohio State, which could make generating early-season sacks extremely difficult.

If no primary edge threat emerges, Knowles may have to blitz more frequently to manufacture pressure.

That can create pressure without necessarily producing sacks.

Projection: 25-29 Team Sacks

Bet: Over 24.5 Team Sacks

Confidence: 6.5/10

Prop Bet #2: Ball State Over 9.5 Interceptions

FanDuel

4.6/5

Tip: Ball State Over 9.5 Interceptions

• Will Yates Returns
• DJ Fields Adds Continuity
• Improved Pressure Could Create Mistakes

New Users – Get $350 in Bonus Bets when you wager $5 for 7 days

Get bonus now

Why the Over Is a Good Bet

Ball State intercepted nine passes in 2025.

The Cardinals only need two more interceptions to reach double digits.

Yates has recorded an interception in each of his first two seasons.

Fields now has a full year of starting experience.

The secondary also adds veteran transfer depth.

Most importantly, better quarterback pressure could generate additional opportunities.

Interceptions frequently begin with the pass rush.

A quarterback throws before he wants to.

A receiver’s route isn’t completely developed.

The football comes out late or off balance.

If Ball State increases its sack total into the upper 20s, the secondary should benefit.

Why the Under Is a Good Bet

Nine interceptions isn’t necessarily a low number.

Ball State would need improvement while replacing significant personnel throughout the defense.

There is also tremendous randomness involved with interceptions.

Yates could break up 10 passes without catching two of them.

Fields could play excellent coverage without an interception.

And opponents may emphasize short, conservative passing attacks if Ball State improves its pressure.

Ohio State also presents a difficult opening matchup where turnover opportunities may be limited.

Projection: 10-12 Interceptions

Bet: Over 9.5 Interceptions

Confidence: 6.5/10

Prop Bet #3: Will Yates Over 7.5 Pass Breakups

Caesars

4.4/5

Tip: Will Yates Over 7.5 Pass Breakups

• Seven PBUs in Only 10 Games
• Preseason All-MAC Corner
• Two Years of Starting Experience

Bet $1 and get double the winnings up to $25 for your next 10 bets

–

Why the Over Is a Good Bet

Yates recorded seven pass breakups in only 10 games last season.

That immediately makes 7.5 appealing.

He only needs one additional breakup compared with last season.

A full 12-game schedule provides more opportunities.

Yates also enters his third college season with considerably more experience.

He understands route combinations.

He understands opposing formations.

And he understands Knowles’ defense.

Ball State already considers him its top cover corner.

Eight pass breakups is a reasonable expectation.

Why the Under Is a Good Bet

Successful corners can become victims of their own success statistically.

If opposing quarterbacks stop throwing at Yates, he cannot break up passes.

Ball State’s other defensive backs could be targeted far more frequently.

There is also health risk.

Yates missed two games last season.

Missing even another two games could make eight pass breakups difficult.

Pass breakups can also fluctuate.

A perfectly defended throw that lands five feet out of bounds doesn’t count.

Neither does excellent coverage that prevents a quarterback from attempting the pass.

Projection: 8-10 Pass Breakups

Bet: Over 7.5 Pass Breakups

Confidence: 7.5/10

Prop Bet #4: Ball State Under 29.5 Points Allowed Per Game

BetMGM

4.5/5

Tip: Ball State Under 29.5 Points Allowed Per Game

• Second Year in Knowles System
• Returning Secondary Leaders
• Improved Transfer Depth

Up To $1500 in Bonus Bets Paid Back if your First Bet Does Not Win

Get bonus now

Why the Under Is a Good Bet

Ball State allowed 29.83 points per game last season.

That means improvement doesn’t have to be dramatic.

Reducing the average by one point per game would cash this benchmark.

Knowles is now in another season with many of his core defensive concepts.

Yates and Fields return in the secondary.

Thomas has an expanded role.

Glenn is a year older.

Lewis adds Power Four experience at linebacker.

The roster is also considerably deeper.

Ball State doesn’t need to transform into a top-25 defense.

It simply needs fewer explosive plays and slightly better third-down defense.

Why the Over Is a Good Bet

The schedule creates an immediate problem.

Ball State opens at Ohio State and later travels to Liberty and Northwestern.

The MAC schedule also includes Toledo, Bowling Green, Ohio and Central Michigan.

One or two 45-point games can dramatically affect a season average.

The Cardinals also lost Voorhis.

If Ball State cannot pressure quarterbacks without blitzing, opposing offenses could create explosive plays against aggressive pressure packages.

The run defense remains another concern.

Last year’s 178.8-yard average must improve.

If it doesn’t, opponents will control possession and consistently reach the red zone.

Projection: 27-29 Points Allowed Per Game

Bet: Under 29.5 Points Allowed Per Game

Confidence: 7/10

Best Ball State Cardinals 2026 Defensive Prop Bet

Will Yates Over 7.5 pass breakups is my favorite Ball State defensive wager.

This is primarily a bet on proven production.

Yates recorded seven pass breakups last season.

He did it in only 10 games.

He now enters 2026 as Ball State’s top cover corner and a preseason All-MAC candidate.

The benchmark only requires eight.

That means Yates doesn’t need an enormous statistical breakout.

He simply needs to stay healthy and maintain approximately the same per-game production.

The potential improvement in Ball State’s pass rush could also help.

Quarterbacks under pressure are forced into throws they might otherwise avoid.

That creates additional opportunities for defensive backs to challenge the football.

My projection is 8-10 pass breakups, making Over 7.5 my strongest Ball State defensive prop.

How Ball State’s Defense Could Determine the 2026 Season

Ball State’s current regular-season win total is 3.5 victories at both BetMGM and DraftKings.

That makes the defense especially important.

Ball State finished 4-8 last season.

Reaching four victories again would cash an Over 3.5 ticket.

The schedule isn’t easy.

Ball State opens on September 5 at Ohio State.

The Cardinals return home against Stony Brook before traveling to Liberty.

MAC play begins at Kent State.

Then come Toledo, Northwestern, Bowling Green and Sacramento State.

November includes UMass, Buffalo, Ohio and Central Michigan.

There are legitimate opportunities.

Stony Brook.

Kent State.

Bowling Green.

Sacramento State.

UMass.

Buffalo.

Central Michigan.

Ball State doesn’t need to dominate those opponents.

It needs to win enough close games.

That is where defense becomes critical.

A team projected near the bottom of a conference can’t consistently expect to win shootouts.

Ball State scored only 15.8 points per game last season.

Even substantial offensive improvement may not produce one of the MAC’s highest-scoring teams.

That means Knowles’ defense needs to turn some 31-20 losses into 24-20 games.

It needs turnovers.

It needs sacks.

It needs field position.

Most importantly, it needs to stop the run.

My projection is 4-8, narrowly putting Ball State Over the 3.5-win total.

But the margin is extremely small.

One defensive stop against Buffalo.

One turnover against Kent State.

One fourth-quarter sack against Central Michigan.

Those plays could determine whether Ball State wins three games or five.

Conclusion

The Ball State Cardinals enter 2026 with plenty of defensive uncertainty but also legitimate reasons to believe the unit can improve during Mike Uremovich’s second season.

The 2025 numbers set a relatively modest baseline.

Ball State allowed 29.8 points and 405.7 yards per game.

Opponents rushed for 178.8 yards per contest.

They passed for 226.8.

And the Cardinals generated 23 sacks and nine interceptions.

Those numbers weren’t good enough.

The biggest offseason loss also came from the defense.

Nathan Voorhis developed into the MAC’s premier pass rusher and earned First-Team All-MAC honors.

There is no obvious 11-sack replacement waiting behind him.

That doesn’t mean Ball State is without answers.

Justin Thomas finally gets the opportunity to become the primary rush linebacker after previously recording 9.5 sacks over two seasons at Indianapolis.

Ameir Glenn returns after appearing in all 12 games and recording 2.5 tackles for loss during his first meaningful college season.

Cincear Lewis arrives from Cincinnati and could immediately become a starting inside linebacker.

And the secondary provides the strongest foundation.

Will Yates returns with 12 career starts, 51 tackles and two interceptions.

He recorded seven pass breakups in only 10 games last season and enters 2026 with preseason All-MAC recognition.

DJ Fields returns after making eight starts and recording 34 tackles. Ball State expects him to become the starting field safety and considers him an all-conference candidate.

Those two players give Knowles experienced leaders on the back end.

My projection has Ball State allowing approximately 27-29 points and 385-400 total yards per game, while producing approximately 25-29 sacks, 10-12 interceptions and 17-20 total takeaways.

That would not make Ball State an elite MAC defense.

It would represent meaningful improvement.

The biggest issue is replacing Voorhis’ pressure production.

Thomas must emerge.

Badie must contribute.

Glenn must take another step.

And Knowles may need multiple defenders to combine for the production one player supplied last season.

The biggest opportunity is in the secondary.

Yates has legitimate All-MAC potential.

Fields has starting experience.

And additional transfer depth should give Ball State more options than it possessed during portions of 2025.

From a betting perspective, my strongest defensive play is Will Yates Over 7.5 pass breakups.

Seven in 10 games last season is a strong statistical foundation.

A healthy 12-game season gives him a realistic opportunity to reach eight, nine or even double digits.

The broader season will depend on whether the defense can help Ball State win close games.

The Cardinals’ regular-season win total sits at 3.5 victories, meaning the market is essentially asking whether Uremovich’s second team can at least match last season’s four-win total.

The path exists.

But Ball State probably won’t get there by simply outscoring everybody.

It must become more physical against the run.

It must replace Voorhis’ sacks collectively.

It must create more turnovers.

And it must lean on veterans such as Yates and Fields when games tighten in the fourth quarter.

If Thomas successfully transitions into the featured pass-rushing role, Lewis stabilizes the linebacker group, Glenn improves inside and the veteran secondary performs at an All-MAC level, Ball State’s defense could improve enough to push the Cardinals beyond their 3.5-win expectation and give Uremovich tangible progress during his second season in Muncie.