
For decades, bowl games were the heartbeat of college football’s postseason. They carried prestige, tradition, and national spotlight. But in the modern era — shaped by the College Football Playoff, NIL, the transfer portal, and evolving player priorities — bowl games have become shells of what they once were.
What was once the pinnacle of a season is now, increasingly, an afterthought. And this year proves the point more clearly than ever.
College football bowl games no longer serve their original purpose, no longer capture national interest, and no longer matter to the players or programs asked to participate.
Here is the in-depth case for why bowl games should no longer be played.
The first and most undeniable truth:
Top players — often the stars who carried their teams through the season — now routinely sit out bowl games, citing:
NFL Draft preparation
Injury risk
Worthless postseason stakes
Transfer portal uncertainty
And the numbers climb every year.
This season alone, dozens of elite players across the Power 5 opted out before bowl selections were even finalized.
The message is undeniable:
If the people actually playing the games don’t value the bowls, why should the sport continue forcing them to exist?
For the first time in modern college football history, double-digit programs elected not to participate in bowl games despite being eligible.
Some schools cited:
Coaching changes
Lack of interest
Player shortages
Focus on next year
Financial considerations
We are now at the point where programs themselves — not just star players — are turning down invitations.
This is unprecedented.
When teams themselves reject the premise that bowls matter, the entire bowl system becomes exposed for what it is:
Turning on December and January bowl games now feels closer to watching spring practice than postseason football.
Here’s why:
• Practice-squad lineups filling entire depth charts • Opt-outs shredding rosters • Players in the transfer portal appearing one week and gone the next • Teams barely above .500 — or below .500 — qualifying**
The result?
Games with:
No continuity
No meaningful stakes
No connection to the teams that played during the regular season
No national viewership
The purity, competitiveness, and excitement that once defined bowl season is gone.
Nothing highlights the decline of the bowl system more than the acceptance of 5–7 football teams — losing teams — as bowl participants.
This year again, multiple 5–7 teams secured bowl spots due to not having enough 6–6 teams available.
Let’s ask the obvious question:
The privilege of postseason play — once reserved for legitimate teams — is now extended to programs that couldn’t even reach .500.
This is not merit. This is not competition. This is not college football tradition.
And the fact that bowls now require losing teams to fill TV slots proves their decline more than any single statistic ever could.
Before the CFP existed, bowls determined champions. Before NIL and the portal, bowls showcased the future of the NFL. Before opt-outs became routine, bowls represented true postseason value.
But now?
Bowls determine nothing.
We have:
CFP semifinals
New Year’s Six
Expanded playoff coming
On-campus playoff games coming
Revenue shared among playoff teams
As the playoff grows, bowls shrink — and with good reason.
Bowl games are now exhibitions, not competitions.
And exhibitions do not need 40+ games, 80+ teams, or made-for-TV corporate logos slapped over once-historic venues.
Viewership numbers tell the story sharply:
Bowl ratings have plummeted for non–New Year’s Six games
Players are absent
Teams are disinterested
Matchups are random
Games often kick off at 11:00 a.m. on a Tuesday
Stadiums are half-empty
Fan enthusiasm has evaporated because bowl games no longer:
Conclude rivalries
Determine championships
Showcase elite players
Feature meaningful stakes
In an era where every game is on TV, nobody needs a “Holiday Bowl” to see national brands anymore.
The marketplace has spoken. Bowls are background noise.
College football has changed dramatically:
The Playoff is the focus
NIL is the currency
Transfer portal is the marketplace
Players are brands
Teams must manage roster retention
Coaches must focus on recruiting windows
None of this aligns with the outdated bowl model.
In fact, bowl games often harm programs:
They disrupt recruiting periods
They encourage premature opt-outs
They expose depth shortages
They require travel budgets many schools cannot justify
They delay offseason transitions and new systems
They risk injuries in meaningless games
For a sport trying to modernize, bowl games are an anchor to the past.
College football has outgrown bowl games. Players have outgrown bowl games. Programs have outgrown bowl games. Fans have outgrown bowl games.
What remains is a hollow shell:
Teams declining invitations
Star players refusing to play
Losing teams qualifying
TV networks propping up meaningless exhibitions
Bowl games once mattered. Today, they don’t.
And there is no logical, competitive, financial, or cultural reason for them to continue.
It’s time to acknowledge reality:
The sport will be better for it.**

21+ and present in VA. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.