Seen on:
as known from New York Timesas known from USA Todayas known from yahoo!
VA
The Grueling Truth - Where Legends Speak / Latest Boxing News & Rumors Today / A History of Bad Judging for Canelo Alvarez

A History of Bad Judging for Canelo Alvarez: It’s not a conspiracy theory if it’s obvious

Does anything in boxing surprise you? It shouldn't.
Publish Date: 09/03/2018
Fact checked by: Mark Lewis

Versus Larry Mosley – Ray Corona – 99-91

The red-headed welterweight was fresh out of Mexico in this one, taking on his first American foe in veteran boxer Larry Mosley. The 15-2-2 (6 KOs) Mosley was no slouch, having an extensive amateur career and a decent professional one. In the unpaid ranks he was a United States Amateur Welterweight Champion twice, fought in the World Championships (defeated Yuri Foreman) and the Olympic Box-Offs (lost to Dante Craig). In the pros he managed draws with Golden Johnson and Miguel Figueroa.

Here he was brought in to provide a test for the young Golden Boy signee, and that he did. Both men started slowly but one thing remained consistent, Mosley’s left stick. He was able to tag the burgeoning star with regularity and maintained defensive quality control throughout. Alvarez later stated that he was “very hesitant” because he could never “hit him twice.”

Mosley’s problem was that he couldn’t find a home for his harder shots on a regular basis and he was never a stiffen-you-flat kind of a guy. “Canelo” wasn’t either, but he was the more damaging of the two. He resorted to a power-puncher approach early on and stuck to it until the end, nicking enough of the rounds.

As a Sweet Science report would later have it, each round was “razor close” but Alvarez’s harder shots gave him the nod for the judges. Fair enough, though probably not fair enough to award the rising prospect all but one round, which is what Ray Corona did.

It should be noted that Larry Mosley and his cornermen knew damn well that a fair decision would not be handed out, when between the 9th and 10th, Mosley’s trainer tells his stool-sitting boxer that they could go home because they’ve (Canelo and company) already got the fight. This is followed by his second-in-command stating calmly, “We not getting no decision baby, we already know that.”

Versus Austin Trout – Stanley Christodoulou – 118-109

Canelo’s first big test came against the New Mexican southpaw, who was 26-0 with 14 knockouts going in. The anticipation was high. Everyone expected a good fight, well, except a South African holding a pencil and paper ringside.

In front of nearly 40,000 adoring fans, “No Doubt” and Golden Boy’s new Golden Boy battled in a game of wits. Trout tentatively out-jabbed and out-threw the freckle-faced Guadalajara-borne boxer-puncher, while Alvarez tried picking his spots. Not much was done to separate their work until the 7th round. Alvarez let rip with a straight right that landed on the button early on, wobbling Trout before he hit the canvas. The lefty got up hurt and was staggered a few more times before the gong sounded.

Afterward, Trout managed to work himself back into the fight, finishing well and earning the victory on scorecards from boxing notables Cliff Rold, Lee Wylie, Mark Ortega, Lem Satterfield, Tom Gray and others. He came damn close to earning a win or draw on cards turned in by Al Bernstein, Dan Rafael, Michael Rosenthal, Bob Velin, Tim Dahlberg, etc. Only two cards that I saw had Alvarez winning more than seven rounds.

How it is that a paid attendant with an official rendering saw it so differently?

Versus Floyd Mayweather – C.J. Ross – 114-114

Alvarez was big business after defeating his only ranked opponent and Mayweather saw an opportunity to cash out on the face of this spritely Mexican. That happened, big time, but not before a big “What the fuck is this?!” was blurted out from Mayweather and fans after listening to maybe the worst card in modern memory announced.

Mayweather dominated from bell one to bell twelve. He scored with clean, accurate shots and allowed virtually nothing to land in return—forget the bogus punch stats. Alvarez did little to help his situation either, as he had a big size and youth advantage, but stuck to a box-first posture—the first thing that made us scratch our heads.

Most simply nodded their heads in approval immediately after the last seconds ticked off. We all knew—Alvarez’s daughter, mother and six fighting brothers included—that it was one-way action. Another stellar performance by “Money”, join the crowd of jazz-clappers.

But then, to the shock of everyone but C.J. Ross and the people that might have slipped her either a sleeping pill or a bag of good-doing-business-with-you cash, Jimmy Lennon Jr. called out a majority decision.

Versus Erislandy Lara – Levi Martinez – 117-111

To his credit, Saul Alvarez didn’t need to take this fight, but he did. Golden Boy would have served much lesser foes on a platter and sugar-coated it for the fans. He stepped up and demanded that this be made after listening to the Cuban make a raucous at his interviews.

The fight didn’t excite many. Alvarez gave chase and banged; Lara circled and stuck to the one-two he’s best-known for. Alvarez landed harder; Lara landed more frequently.

A close examination of scores from those at press row and those viewing on their television showed once again that this was a nail-bitingly close affair and that the judges’ tally would do justice to that. Jerry Roth and Dave Moretti did their part. Levi Martinez did not.

Versus Miguel Cotto – Dave Moretti – 119-109

Fans, hardcore and casual alike, thought this was a quality scrap to be made, and one that made financial sense. You had, in Mayweather’s famously repetitive quote, “A young, hungry lion” squaring off with a faded champion. Cotto was “the man” who had beaten “the man” (Sergio Martinez), who had beaten “the man” (Kelly Pavlik).

The odds-on favorite was Canelo and most agreed he should be. The majority of boxing people acknowledged a winning performance after the bout had played out. However, most did not agree with Dave Moretti’s atrociously biased scorecard. Doug Fischer, Steve Kim and Harold Lederman all came up with 117-111 for Canelo. According to Fischer, “most media members around us scored it 116-112 for Alvarez.”

Dan Rafael had it closer, while a minority gave Cotto credit.

Versus Gennady Golovkin – Adalaide Byrd – 118-110

This was the most anticipated middleweight showdown in a long time. Gennady Golovkin had been pounding out contender and pretender alike, waiting in line to get the biggest fight available. Then, after half a decade, it finally arrives. Golden Boy offered up their Golden Pony.

Alvarez and Golovkin both seemed keen on making statements going in. What we got was a thoroughly enjoyable fight, but a thoroughly unenjoyable taint in Adalaide Byrd’s appointment as 1/3 of the jury that would help decide these boxers’ fate.

Out of 32 people I personally polled, drawn largely from well-known boxing contributors (Doug Fischer, Michael Montero, Lee Groves, Springs Toledo, Lennox Lewis, etc.) *, only four managed a draw and one…I repeat one…had Alvarez earning a decision.

Of a larger percentage taken by someone and posted on a highly-trafficked forum, the results bear further evidence of the oddity:

As Jim Lampley remarked in the latest 24/7, “118-110. First of all, that didn’t happen for either fighter. It particularly didn’t happen for Canelo. Immediately you knew that you were in Looney Tunes Land.”

Incompetence or Corruption?

Both ineptitude and corruption are longstanding aspects of judging in this sport of the ancients, but when the big fights are being made a certain amount of time and effort is put in to ensure that veterans or newly-come elbow-rubbers usually get to sit near the apron. How is it then that these folks, who are often praised for their track records by the Swamp-Lords of Pugilistica, just happen to screw it up regularly, and oftentimes conveniently, for the fighter who has the money backing them?

How is it that Bob Bennett, the head of the Nevada State Athletic Commission, can constantly oversee injustice after injustice (four of these examples happened in Las Vegas) yet still praise the résumés of those doling it out and offer no solution?

These examples and so many others don’t whisper the word incompetence to me. There is too much premeditation. It is too political. Let us call a spade a spade—it’s grade-A corruption that the rats of Washington D.C. could admire.

Until the movers and shakers in the media, the boxers, the fans, and other contributors hold these people accountable, don’t hold your breath until the next travesty.

Read Also
Tommy Morrison and AIDS: The Truth about what happened, and how he Died.
Tommy Morrison burst onto the professional boxing scene in 1988. Following a ...
Esteban de Jesus, Roberto Duran y AIDS (1972-89)
Many of us dream of celebrity sports fame, but only cruel individuals ...
Bet365 Promo
Which American Olympic Boxing Team Was the Greatest: 1976 or 1984
I think it is very little to no debate that the two ...
The Sunshine Showdown (aka/ “Down Goes Frazier”), Jamaica, 1973
“The Sunshine Showdown”, 1973, has lost some of its luster due to ...
Marvin Hagler and Sugar Ray Seales: The Unlikely Trilogy
“I’m going to kill him. They can’t stop me. I’ll kill them ...
Looking Back: George Foreman vs. Muhammad Ali
Forty-seven years ago, many said the fight between undisputed heavyweight champion of ...
Peter Maher: An Irish Tribute
INTRO: I was seriously ill in 2018 with 7 nights in the ...
Ranking the top 200 players in the NFL ahead of the 2021 season
This list isn’t based solely on performances from the 2020 NFL season. ...
Jack Moriarty and 1880’s Canadian Boxing
Sports journalist, Ed Fitkin, worked in print journalism at Toronto’s Daily Globe would find ...
The Forgotten Canadian Champion (And Maybe It’s Deserved): Billy Hawkins
As Mike Goodpaster and I prepare our popular Old-Time Boxing Show podcast, ...
Top Betting Sites
Top Betting Bonuses
DraftKings
DraftKings
DraftKings Review
4.6/5
FanDuel
4.6/5
BetMGM
4.5/5
Bet365
4.5/5
Caesars
4.5/5
Fanatics
Fanatics
Fanatics Review
4.3/5
Barstool
Barstool Review
4.5/5
Bally Bet
Bally Bet Review
4.3/5
DraftKings
DraftKings Promo
New Customers: Bet $5+ and get $300 in Bonus Bets if it wins!
T&Cs apply
4.6/5
21+ and present in most states. (18+ DC/KY/NH/WY). Void in ONT/OR/NH. Eligibility restrictions apply. On behalf of Boot Hill Casino & Resort (KS). Pass-thru of per wager tax may apply in IL. 1 per new customer. Must register new account to receive reward Token. Must select Token BEFORE placing min. $5 bet to receive $300 in Bonus Bets if your bet wins. Min. -500 odds req. Token and Bonus Bets are single-use and non-withdrawable. Token expires 2/1/26. Bonus Bets expire in 7 days (168 hours). Stake removed from payout. Terms: sportsbook.draftkings.com/promos. Ends 1/25/26 at 11:59 PM ET. Sponsored by DK.
FanDuel
FanDuel Promo
Bet $5 Get $300 in Bonus Bets If Your Bet Wins!
T&Cs apply
4.6/5
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER or visit RG-help.com. Call 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpg.org/chat (CT). Hope is here. GamblingHelpLineMA.org or call (800) 327-5050 for 24/7 support (MA). Visit www.mdgamblinghelp.org (MD). Call 1-877-HOPE-NY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY). 21+ (18+ DC, KY and present in select states for KS in affiliation with Kansas Star Casino). First online real money wager only. $5 first deposit required. Bonus issued as nonwithdrawable bonus bets which expire 7 days after receipt. Restrictions apply. See terms at sportsbook.fanduel.com.
BetMGM
BetMGM Promo
Up To $1500 in Bonus Bets Paid Back if your First Bet Does Not Win
T&Cs apply
4.5/5
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER (Available in the US) Call 877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY) Call 1-800-327-5050 (MA) 21+ only. Please Gamble Responsibly. Call 1-800-NEXT-STEP (AZ), 1-800-BETS-OFF (IA), 1-800-981-0023 (PR). Rewards are non-withdrawable bonus bets that expire in 7 days. In partnership with Kansas Crossing Casino and Hotel. See BetMGM.com for Terms. US promotional offers not available in DC, Mississippi, New York, Nevada, Ontario, or Puerto Rico.
Bet365
Bet365 Promo
Bet $5 & Get $200 in Bonus Bets Win or Lose
T&Cs apply
4.5/5
Whatever the moment. It's Never Ordinary at bet365. That's why if you sign up now you will receive $200 in Bonus Bets Win or Lose when you bet $5! Minimum $10 deposit required. Minimum odds -500 of greater. Bonus Bets wager excluded from returns. New customers only. T&CS, time limits and exclusions apply. GAMBLING PROBLEM? CALL OR TEXT 1-800-GAMBLER (AZ/CO/IL/IN/KS/KY/LA/MD/NC/NJ/OH/PA/TN/VA) or 1-800-BETS OFF (IA). 21+ (18+ KY). Must be present in AZ/CO/IA/IL/IN/KS/KY/LA (select parishes)/MD/NC/NJ/OH/PA/TN/VA.
Caesars
Caesars Promo
Up to $250 Bonus Bet
T&Cs apply
4.5/5
21+ New users only. Must register using eligible promo code. First bet after registration must qualify. Max. Bonus Bet: $1,000. Bonus Bet expires 14 days after receipt. Void where prohibited. See Caesars.com/promos for full terms. Gambling Problem? 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537)
Fanatics
Fanatics Promo
Bet $50, Get $300 in FanCash
T&Cs apply
4.3/5
Must be 21+. GAMBLING PROBLEM? CALL 1-800-GAMBLER or 1-800-522-4700, Home (MD), (800)-327-5050 or MA Gambling Helpline (MA), Call (877)8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY), or Call 1-800-NEXT-STEP or text NEXTSTEP to 53342 (AZ), (888) 789-7777 or CONNECTICUT COUNCIL – ON PROBLEM GAMBLING (CT), or 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), If gambling is more than a game, free help is available . . . - NCDHHS Problem Gambling (NC). New customers in AZ, CO, CT, DC, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, MI, MO, NC, NJ, NY, OH, PA, TN, VA, VT, WV, or WY. Must opt-in and wager $10+ cash on any market with odds of -500 or longer to receive $100 in FanCash each day for your first 3 days (issued when qualifying wager settles). Your 3 days begin the day you establish your account. FanCash rewards expire at 11:59 p.m. ET 7 days from issuance. Terms, including FanCash terms, apply - see Fanatics Sportsbook app.
Barstool Promo
T&Cs apply
4.5/5
Latest Sport News
The Greatest Football Story Ever Told, is now Complete!
I wrote an article after the Indiana Hoosiers ...
The Trench Truth: Why Miami’s Size Won’t Decide This Game
If you’ve heard one talking point all week, ...
Miami’s Past vs. Indiana’s Present: Two Programs, Two Eras, One Night
College football rarely gives us clean contrasts anymore. ...
Championship Quarterback Showdown: Why Fernando Mendoza Is Built for This Mom...
Championship games don’t just reveal who has the ...
Josh Allen in the Playoffs: Greatness Delayed by the Same Mistakes
Josh Allen is one of the most physically ...
Miami’s Defensive Line vs Indiana’s Offensive Line an In-Depth Lo...
From Miami’s point of view, the conversation around ...
Latest NFL Betting Picks

Our Team
Mike GoodpasterMark LewisAuthor IconJohn RaspantiSamuel Teets
+6
Mike Goodpaster
Mike Goodpaster
Chief Editor
Mark Lewis
Mark Lewis
Editor
Author Icon
Christopher Carlson
Author
John Raspanti
John Raspanti
Author
Samuel Teets
Samuel Teets
US Sports Veteran
Daniel Kornhauser
Daniel Kornhauser
Author
Chris Benedict
Chris Benedict
Editor
James Ernest
James Ernest
Author
Shelley Harcar
Shelley Harcar
Sports Writer
Ellis Williams
Ellis Williams
Author
Dr. Jay Gee
Dr. Jay Gee
Author

21+ and present in VA. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

This site is using Cloudflare and adheres to the Google Safe Browsing Program. We adapted Google's Privacy Guidelines to keep your data safe at all times.
Virginia Town HallCloudflareSSL
Close
Our Sports Pros recommend these awesome sports betting sites this week:
DraftKings
DraftKings Promo
New Customers: Bet $5+ and get $300 in Bonus Bets if it wins!
Our Favorite
T&Cs and 21+ apply
Code:
Open DraftKings
Get Bonus
FanDuel
FanDuel Promo
Bet $5 Get $300 in Bonus Bets If Your Bet Wins!
Best Slots
T&Cs and 21+ apply
Code:
Open FanDuel
Get Bonus
BetMGM
BetMGM Promo
Up To $1500 in Bonus Bets Paid Back if your First Bet Does Not Win
Newcomer
T&Cs and 21+ apply
Code:
Open BetMGM
Get Bonus
×
Your Promo Code:
The bonus offer of was already opened in an additional window. If not, you can open it also by clicking the following link:
Play now