VA
  • TGT on YouTube
  • About TGT
  • The TGT Team
  • How TGT rates
  • Responsible Gambling Advice
  • Contact Our Team
  • Writers Wanted
  • Content Disclaimer
  • Affiliate Disclosure
Contains commercial content
Billboard Left
Billboard Left
The Grueling Truth - Where Legends Speak / How the Raiders Misplayed Their Hand in the Khalil Mack Negotiations

How the Raiders Misplayed Their Hand in the Khalil Mack Negotiations

The Raiders messed up
Publish Date: 09/05/2018
Fact checked by: Mike Goodpaster
HOUSTON, TX - JANUARY 07: Oakland Raiders defensive end Khalil Mack (52) reacting after stopping Houston Texans wide receiver Will Fuller (15) in the back field during the first half of the AFC Wild Card football game between the Houston Texans and the Oakland Raiders at NRG Stadium in Houston. (Photo by Juan DeLeon/Icon Sportswire)

The Oakland Raiders have traded their best player, Khalil Mack, in a deal that is about as underwhelming as you can get for such an elite talent. Not only did the Raiders give up one of, if not the best defender in the NFL, they also gave up a second round pick in the deal. Thus, in essence, the Raiders gave up Mack to get one first rounder, to move up from the second to the first and to get a pick in the third and the sixth.

Clearly, this is not the way the Raiders wanted things to go down. Sure, they will talk up the value they got in the trade, but behind closed doors, you know there are whispers about how little value they got in the trade.

So what happened?

Based on the information that has come out, the best guess I can make (because we may never know the full truth) is that the Raiders misplayed the situation, found themselves in a place they didn’t expect to be then freaked out and traded Mack for far too little.

Why do I say that? There are a number of reasons, mostly tied to what Jon Gruden had to say about the trade on Sunday.

First and foremost, Gruden stated that the offer they made to Mack was nowhere near what the Bears offered. Obviously, that could mean a lot of different things but if it means, as was reported, that the highest offer the Raiders made was $20 a year, they never really had plans to re-sign him.

Everyone around the league, from commentators, to general managers, to coaches, to fans knew that inking Mack would take a higher per year number than that. So what does that tell us? That in all likelihood, Gruden’s plan was to have Mack play through his fifth year option, then tag him for two years before letting him walk.

That way, Gruden would get Mack for a few years as he re-constructs this roster, then lets him walk after saving a decent amount of money over those last three years since the tag and his fifth year option would be far less than the cost of a long term deal.

But then Mack held out longer than they expected. How do we know that? Because Gruden said so in that press conference. Gruden said that with the Rams game right around the corner, he felt like his hand was pushed to make a move.

And that’s where he made the big mistake.

Vic Tafur of The Athletic noted on the State of the Nation podcast that he looked at past holdouts by Joel Segal represented players and they almost always reported back to the team by week one rather than miss out on game checks. Thus, it’s likely that Mack planned on being back with the Raiders in time for week one. But rather than call Mack’s bluff, Gruden jumped the gun and traded him out of fear that Mack would hold out well into the season. How do we know that? Because Gruden said he was worried the holdout would last into the season during the presser.

While I don’t think keeping Mack for three years via the fifth year option and two tags was the ideal end to this situation, it’s surely a better end than not having Mack for those three years thanks to a poor trade. And if the Raiders were going to trade Mack, they should’ve done it before the draft when they could’ve used the value to obtain players who would help the team now.

What’s done is done and hopefully the Raiders will be able to make the most out of those draft picks. And hopefully, Gruden has learned a little bit in how to handle such situations since this one, by Gruden’s own words, clearly did not go as anyone planned.

Read More Raiders Articles at Black Hole Banter

Read Also
Esteban de Jesus, Roberto Duran y AIDS (1972-89)
Many of us dream of celebrity sports fame, but only cruel individuals ...
Elmer Ray: The Humble Man of Hastings
"Men judge generally more by the eye than by the hand, for ...
BetRivers.com Promo
Grading every NFL team’s picks from the 2021 NFL Draft
Quickly, click away if you’re going to get upset by reading draft ...
Daniel K’s 2021 NFL Draft Position Rankings/Draft Grades
  Round Grade Big Board Rank Position Rank Player Name Position College ...
Sam Teets 2021 NFL three-round predictive mock draft 6.0
This is a predictive NFL mock draft and my final of the ...
Top 100 remaining 2021 NFL free agents after Day 1
This is the most up-to-date list of available NFL free agents following ...
Ranking the top 200 players in the NFL ahead of the 2021 season
This list isn’t based solely on performances from the 2020 NFL season. ...
Bonus of the month
BetRivers.com - Get your Free Bet now! Get your Free Bet now!
Latest News
NFL QB Power Rankings Week 13
As we head down the home stretch of ...
NFL TNF WK 13 Bills vs Patriots: Odds, Tips, and Predictions 12/01/22
📅 Date: Thursday, December,01 🕚 Game Time: 8:20 ...
Indiana vs North Carolina – College Basketball: Odds, Tips and Predicti...
📅 Date: Sunday, November, 30 🕚 Game Time: ...
Our Latest YouTube Videos
Video: Froggy Talkin Sports W/ Ryan and Joe
Froggy Talkin Sports W/ Ryan and Joe
Video: The NFL Draft Show
The NFL Draft Show
Video: NFL Prediction Show: Week 8 Picking all games against the spread
NFL Prediction Show: Week 8 Picking all games against the spread
Betting Tips
Top Betting Sites
Top Betting Bonuses
SI Sportsbook
SI Sportsbook
SI Sportsbook Review
97/100
BetRivers.com
BetRivers.com
BetRivers.com Review
95/100
BetMGM
BetMGM
BetMGM Review
94/100
DraftKings
DraftKings
DraftKings Review
92/100
FanDuel
FanDuel
FanDuel Review
90/100
SI Sportsbook
SI Sportsbook Bonus
BET $20 GET $200 IN FREE BETS
T&Cs apply
9.7/10
First deposit only | 21+ & located in CO, MI, VA | Promo code EXTRA200| A qualifying bet is $20 or more | Min odds of +120 or more | Free Bet Tokens credited after bet is settled and expire after 7 days | Free Bet stakes not included in winnings | Please Gamble Responsibly - Gambling Problem? VA: CALL 1-888-532-3500, CO: CALL 1-800-522-4700, MI: CALL 1-800-270-7117 | Full T&C apply
BetRivers.com
BetRivers.com Bonus
100% up to $500
T&Cs apply
9.5/10
BetMGM
BetMGM Bonus
100% up to $1000
T&Cs apply
9.4/10
DraftKings
DraftKings Bonus
20% up to $1000
T&Cs apply
9.2/10
WynnBET
WynnBET Bonus
Bet $100 Get $100
T&Cs apply
9/10
Our Team
Mike GoodpasterAuthor IconJosh SchwartzSamuel TeetsMark Lewis
+4
Mike Goodpaster
Mike Goodpaster
Chief Editor
Author Icon
Christopher Carlson
Content Writer
Josh Schwartz
Josh Schwartz
Editor
Samuel Teets
Samuel Teets
US Sports Veteran
Mark Lewis
Mark Lewis
Editor
Simon Briffa
Simon Briffa
Sports Editor
Chris Benedict
Chris Benedict
Editor
Author Icon
Malik Zorrok
Author
John Raspanti
John Raspanti
Author
Billboard Left
Billboard Left
Find out what the legends have to say about sports this week....

If you enjoy hearing from the legends of pro sports, then be sure to tune into “The Grueling Truth” sports shows, “Where the legends speak”

Contact us: [email protected]

Players must be 21 years of age or older or reach the minimum age for gambling in their respective state and located in jurisdictions where online gambling is legal. Please play responsibly. Bet with your head, not over it. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, and wants help, call or visit: (a) the Council on Compulsive Gambling of New Jersey at 1-800-Gambler or www.800gambler.org; or (b) Gamblers Anonymous at 855-2-CALL-GA or www.gamblersanonymous.org.

Trading financial products carries a high risk to your capital, especially trading leverage products such as CFDs. CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

This site is using Cloudflare and adheres to the Google Safe Browsing Program. We adapted Google's Privacy Guidelines to keep your data safe at all times.

ccww
Move to Top
Close
Our Sports Pros recommend these awesome Social Casino sites this week:
×
Your Bonus Code:
The bonus offer of was already opened in an additional window. If not, you can open it also by clicking the following link:
Visit Site