VA
  • TGT on YouTube
  • About TGT
  • The TGT Team
  • How TGT rates
  • Responsible Gambling Advice
  • Contact Our Team
  • Writers Wanted
  • Content Disclaimer
  • Affiliate Disclosure
Contains commercial content
Billboard Left
Billboard Left
The Grueling Truth - Where Legends Speak / The Extra Point Rule Change & Two-Point Conversions

The Extra Point Rule Change & Two-Point Conversions

New Rules!
Publish Date: 06/01/2017
Fact checked by: Mike Goodpaster
NFL eliminating the extra point?

When the NFL decided to move the extra point line of scrimmage back from the 2 yard line to the 15 yard, line there was an immediate impact to the game.  Missing an extra point was such an anomaly in the past that even a casual fan could see that a major shift had occurred, but there are questions that remain.  How much did the game change and what does it mean for the future of the NFL?

The Effect of the Extra Point Rule Change

The NFL wanted to make a change with regard to extra points because converting extra points prior to 2015 was almost automatic.  Spectators would not pay attention to the play because they already knew the outcome.  

In fact, in the 2013 and 2014 regular seasons, NFL teams converted 2,463 of 2,476 or 99.5% of extra point attempts.  In the two regular seasons since the rule change took effect (2015 & 2016), NFL teams have converted 2,259 of 2,405, or 93.9% of extra point attempts.  This is a drop off of 5.6%, which equates to roughly 67 points per season.  Because converting an extra point is no longer a given, fans pay attention and save their bathroom breaks and beer runs for later.

As you would expect, the decrease in extra point percentage has led to an increase in the number of two-point conversion attempts.  Since the extra point rule change went into effect, there has been a 55.5% increase in the number of two-point conversions attempted.  

While this is a substantial increase, we have seen only a small statistically irrelevant increase in the success rate of two-point conversions.  The success rate went up from 47.7% in the two regular seasons prior to the rule change, to 48.2% in the two seasons since the rule change went into effect.  Given that there are still only about 100 attempts per year, a 0.5% is a difference of one play.  

The Argument No NFL Coach Wants to Hear

Since 1994 when the two-point conversion came to the NFL, there have been those who have argued that going for two every time is the best strategy.  This argument has become stronger as the likelihood of making an extra point has decreased.  The scenario below provides a simplified example.

Team A scores 100 touchdowns in a season, and having an ever so slightly above average kicker, converts on 94% of extra points.  The team scores 94 points on these conversions. 

Team B scores 100 touchdowns in a season and having decided not to kick extra points, attempts 100 two-point conversations.  Despite the fact that they attempt more two-point conversations than the rest of the league combined, they are ever so slightly below average at scoring on two-point conversions and are successful on 48% of their attempts.  The team scores 96 points on these conversions.

Team B outscores Team A for the season.  This is not to say that teams should never attempt an extra point, but the statistics show that if you are average at both, over time it will be more beneficial to repeatedly go for two.  

In order to out-perform Team B in the above scenario, a team would need to convert on at least 96% of their extra point attempts.  In 2016 only twelve teams achieved this task.  For those twelve teams, kicking extra points makes sense.  The remaining twenty teams may want to consider an alternative strategy.  

The above example neglects to mention how hard touchdowns are to come by and that no NFL team is coming anywhere close to scoring 100 touchdowns in a season. While this argument makes sense over the course of 100 attempts, the scenario changes as that number declines.  

For instance, if a person were to flip a coin 100 times odds are that they would end up getting heads roughly 50 times and tails roughly 50 times.  However, if a person were to flip a coin 2 times or 4 times, the sample size is much too small to produce the expected result.  

This example is simplified as the odds of flipping a coin heads is 50% while the success rate of two-point conversions is 48%.  It was used to demonstrate that whether a team has a prolific offense that provides 4 opportunities a game to go for two, or an average offense that provides only 2, the number of attempts may not be enough to produce the desired result.  The sequence of the results can cause problems on a short-term​ basis.  A team may be able to convert on close to 50% of their two-point conversion attempts, but if they happen to go 0 for 2 or 0 for 4 in a given game, it could cost them that game.

Obviously the scenarios discussed above are based on overall league statistics.  Football is not played in a vacuum and the skills and preparation of coaches and players play a major role.  It is likely that the first team, to go for two every time, would score on more than 50% of their attempts, at least initially, but the number would level off as defenses catch up.  In the end, the situation will always dictate what the right call for a coach to make is.

Changing the Default Setting

In football, it is important to adjust to the situation.  Because the rate of converting an extra point will always be higher than the rate of scoring on a two-point conversion, going for two every time does not make sense.  What would make sense is changing the default.  

Currently, teams elect to go for two because it makes mathematical sense in a certain situation.  If a team scores a touchdown and is now trailing 9 to 14 with only two minutes left, the team should go for two because a successful two-point conversion would put them down by only a field goal.  Similarly, if the default is to go for two, a coach may choose to take the points if it puts them at an advantage.  

For instance if a team scores a touchdown giving them a 14 to 6 lead late in the game, they would kick the extra point.  This would give them a nine point lead and ensure that the other team has to score twice to take the lead.

Conclusion

In football, the terms “extra point” and “point after touchdown (PAT)” are used somewhat interchangeably.  You could make a case that prior to 2015, NFL teams attempted extra points, as the name seems to imply that it is something they get for free.  Now they attempt the much more difficult PATs.  In any event, the game has changed, and with it, so must we.  It is time for coaches to seriously consider going for two more often.  If a team cannot find a kicker who will make a certain percentage of his extra points, it may be time to figure out if going for two makes more sense for them.  For teams who have tall jump-ball receivers or are highly successful scoring on the goal line by other means, it could be the right call.

Follow us on Twitter @CoachMinich and @GruelingTruth and Like us on Facebook

Read Also
Come Fly with me: How the 1988-89 Chicago Bulls pushed forward to an NBA dynasty.
Find the best sportsbook to bet on the NBA Playoffs! Prologue: By ...
Esteban de Jesus, Roberto Duran y AIDS (1972-89)
Many of us dream of celebrity sports fame, but only cruel individuals ...
SI Sportsbook Promo
Elmer Ray: The Humble Man of Hastings
"Men judge generally more by the eye than by the hand, for ...
Ranking the top 200 players in the NFL ahead of the 2021 season
This list isn’t based solely on performances from the 2020 NFL season. ...
Top 100 NFL free agents entering the 2021 offseason
Below is a list of the top 100 free agents available this ...
NFC East Early 2020 NFL Free Agency Outlook
The NFC East is the weirdest division in football. It looked like ...
Five best players from each of the last ten NFL drafts
I was feeling in the mood to revisit some of the previous ...
Selecting the Best Player on Every NFL Team Heading into 2019
This article lists the best player on every team in the NFL ...
2019 NFL Draft top five players per position after the combine
The 2019 NFL Draft is less than a month away and I’m ...
Bonus of the month
SI Sportsbook - Get your Free Bet now! Get your Free Bet now!
Latest News
Top 10 Pound for Pound Boxers 12/05/22
The criteria for the Grueling Truth Pound for ...
NFL Week 13 MNF Saints vs Buccaneers: Odds, Tips and Predictions 12/05/22
📅 Date: Monday, December, 05 🕚 Game Time: ...
Top 10 Things we learned from week 13 of the NFL season
The Eagles dominated a good Tennessee Titans team ...
Our Latest YouTube Videos
Video: The Sports Zone: Top Sports News: Luke Fickell is gone, Bengals/Chiefs Preview and more
The Sports Zone: Top Sports News: Luke Fickell is gone, Bengals/Chiefs Preview and more
Video: The NFL Draft Show
The NFL Draft Show
Video: Froggy Talkin Sports W/Ryan & Joe
Froggy Talkin Sports W/Ryan & Joe
Betting Tips
Top Betting Sites
Top Betting Bonuses
SI Sportsbook
SI Sportsbook
SI Sportsbook Review
97/100
BetRivers.com
BetRivers.com
BetRivers.com Review
95/100
BetMGM
BetMGM
BetMGM Review
94/100
DraftKings
DraftKings
DraftKings Review
92/100
FanDuel
FanDuel
FanDuel Review
90/100
SI Sportsbook
SI Sportsbook Bonus
BET $20 GET $200 IN FREE BETS
T&Cs apply
9.7/10
First deposit only | 21+ & located in CO, MI, VA | Promo code EXTRA200| A qualifying bet is $20 or more | Min odds of +120 or more | Free Bet Tokens credited after bet is settled and expire after 7 days | Free Bet stakes not included in winnings | Please Gamble Responsibly - Gambling Problem? VA: CALL 1-888-532-3500, CO: CALL 1-800-522-4700, MI: CALL 1-800-270-7117 | Full T&C apply
BetRivers.com
BetRivers.com Bonus
100% up to $500
T&Cs apply
9.5/10
BetMGM
BetMGM Bonus
100% up to $1000
T&Cs apply
9.4/10
DraftKings
DraftKings Bonus
20% up to $1000
T&Cs apply
9.2/10
WynnBET
WynnBET Bonus
Bet $100 Get $100
T&Cs apply
9/10
Our Team
Mike GoodpasterAuthor IconJosh SchwartzSamuel TeetsMark Lewis
+6
Mike Goodpaster
Mike Goodpaster
Chief Editor
Author Icon
Christopher Carlson
Content Writer
Josh Schwartz
Josh Schwartz
Editor
Samuel Teets
Samuel Teets
US Sports Veteran
Mark Lewis
Mark Lewis
Editor
Simon Briffa
Simon Briffa
Sports Editor
Chris Benedict
Chris Benedict
Editor
Author Icon
Malik Zorrok
Author
John Raspanti
John Raspanti
Author
Brian Coburn
Brian Coburn
Author
Peter Bonahoom
Peter Bonahoom
Author
Billboard Left
Billboard Left
Find out what the legends have to say about sports this week....

If you enjoy hearing from the legends of pro sports, then be sure to tune into “The Grueling Truth” sports shows, “Where the legends speak”

Contact us: [email protected]

Players must be 21 years of age or older or reach the minimum age for gambling in their respective state and located in jurisdictions where online gambling is legal. Please play responsibly. Bet with your head, not over it. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, and wants help, call or visit: (a) the Council on Compulsive Gambling of New Jersey at 1-800-Gambler or www.800gambler.org; or (b) Gamblers Anonymous at 855-2-CALL-GA or www.gamblersanonymous.org.

Trading financial products carries a high risk to your capital, especially trading leverage products such as CFDs. CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

This site is using Cloudflare and adheres to the Google Safe Browsing Program. We adapted Google's Privacy Guidelines to keep your data safe at all times.

ccww
Move to Top
Close
Our Sports Pros recommend these awesome Social Casino sites this week:
×
Your Bonus Code:
The bonus offer of was already opened in an additional window. If not, you can open it also by clicking the following link:
Visit Site