Publish Date: 02/18/2019
Fact checked by: Mike Goodpaster
When some of these viewership numbers get released and they turnout disappointingly, no one should be surprised. It’s a sport that will continually shoot itself in the foot because of the confusing structure, blatant corruption, etc.
Speaking of corruption, did anyone have Figueroa winning wide? I saw loads of folks who thought it could have gone either way, including one of the commentators. Besides that, it’s noteworthy how Figueroa doesn’t take the game serious enough and he’s a knockoff waiting to happen. I thought he could be a player at 135, but he looks slightly flabby and under-powered above that weight.
Brandon Rios and Humberto Soto is another piss-poor main event. This would have been a quality scrap 8-9 years ago, but it should be confined to little more than a fun supplementary bout on the undercard nowadays.
Source: Boxing PrimeSource: LOLBOXINGMEMESSource: Boxing AnticsSource: 50 Cent
Source: Tyrone Freitas
Don’t forget to let us know when you come across something like what you see above or below at @Gruelingtruth, @GriffosHanky, @TGTN_Boxing, or notify us on Facebook, either on my Page, TGTN, or TGTN Boxing. You get a write-in at the bottom of the articles.
I think it’s more than reasonable to assume Hagler would have beaten GGG, Alvarez, and Jacobs, and I don’t have a big issue with someone saying Mugabi would have potentially beaten these three. I don’t buy the Mugabi bit, personally, but my issue is with the polarized answers. GGG, nor Alvarez is not ‘wiping the floor’ with a prime Hagler, no one is.
Ray Leonard’s opinion isn’t exactly controversial.
It’s a question my inebriated mother used to ask me often. And now I direct it at others.
I feel like this is Will Vickers in disguise.
Amazing this guy still has believers.
Not a bad point about Gatti, either. While I’m not advocating for his Hall of Fame induction, it’s worth pressing home that has become a transcendent figure who gets loads of play in groups because of his action-packed style. In that regard, maybe it’s worth putting him aside from so many others who are judged differently.
*Thanks to Bill Demas for contributing again.
Players must be 21 years of age or older or reach the minimum age for gambling in their respective state and located in jurisdictions where online gambling is legal. Please play responsibly. Bet with your head, not over it. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, and wants help, call or visit: (a) the Council on Compulsive Gambling of New Jersey at 1-800-Gambler or www.800gambler.org; or (b) Gamblers Anonymous at 855-2-CALL-GA or www.gamblersanonymous.org.
Trading financial products carries a high risk to your capital, especially trading leverage products such as CFDs. CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
This site is using Cloudflare and adheres to the Google Safe Browsing Program. We adapted Google's Privacy Guidelines to keep your data safe at all times.