VA
  • TGT on YouTube
  • About TGT
  • The TGT Team
  • How TGT rates
  • Responsible Gambling Advice
  • Contact Our Team
  • Writers Wanted
  • Content Disclaimer
  • Affiliate Disclosure
Contains commercial content
Billboard Left
Billboard Left
The Grueling Truth - Where Legends Speak / Boxing News / A Descent Into Murkier Waters: An alternative review of the boxing decade

A Descent Into Murkier Waters: An alternative review of the boxing decade

A look at the shameless proliferation of ABC belts
Publish Date: 01/17/2020
Fact checked by: Mike Goodpaster
Boxing: WBA/WBC/IBO World Middleweight Title: Canelo Alvarez with title belts with members of entourage after fight vs Gennady Golovkin at T-Mobile Arena. Las Vegas, NV 9/15/2018 CREDIT: Erick W. Rasco (Photo by Erick W. Rasco /Sports Illustrated via Getty Images) (Set Number: X162141 TK1 )

January is here, meaning it’s the time of ​year​ when boxing looks ahead to what may be on the horizon in the upcoming months and simultaneously reflects on what happened in the previous twelve. Debate is split between the best fights that can be made now that a new year has begun and the end of year awards to commemorate the best of the recently departed annum.

But as we enter 2020 and the start of an entirely new decade, reflection in particular is especially pertinent. Never mind who the 2019 “Fighter of the Year” was, who was the “Fighter of the Decade”? Was the fight of the past year as dramatic and enthralling as anything we have seen since 2010?

Perhaps a more important, yet much less prevalent, discussion however is how boxing as a whole has changed over the past ten years. It’s well documented that boxing continues to be plagued by numerous issues that frustrate fans and many involved with the sport. There aren’t enough fights that truly pit the best against the best, there are too many protected fighters, far too many outlandish scorecards. Too many instances of blatant bias or corruption.

On a personal note however, my biggest gripe with the sport today is the continued fragmentation of championships. Modern day boxing has too many belts and seemingly with each passing decade has been watering down what it really means to be a champion.

So has the past decade seen an improvement in this matter? Unfortunately, the fact that you happen to be on this site reading this article means that’s a question you more than likely already know the answer to.

At the start of 2010, there were four universally recognised sanctioning bodies within the sport, the WBA, WBC, IBF and WBO. That was one more than at the start of the previous decade – the WBO didn’t earn universal recognition as a major world title until the mid-2000s – but, despite​ the attempts of the IBO to legitimise itself as the fifth major sanctioning body in recent years​, as 2019 closed mainstream acknowledgement remained with that quartet. That’s the good news. Boxing managed to get through an entire decade without accepting yet another sanctioning body, saner heads generally prevailing that it’s bad enough we already have four of them.

Yet that didn’t mean that boxing couldn’t find a way to add ​more ​ “world champions” to an already overcrowded picture. Again, in 2010 we had four sanctioning bodies and there were – as there thankfully still remains at the time of writing – seventeen weight classes, meaning that at any given point there was the potential for sixty-eight world title belts within the sport. The past decade has seen the advent of multiple champions recognised at the same weight by the ​same  sanctioning body. The WBA and WBC in particular, ironically the two most respected and longest established of the four major bodies, have over the past ten years begun handing out world titles like confetti in exchange for lined pockets.

Since the turn of the century the WBA has occasionally recognised both a ‘super’ and ‘regular’ champion at the same weight class, a situation that was actually born out of Lennox Lewis’ reign as undisputed heavyweight champion. The original reason for the creation of an elevated champion however was, to quote directly from the official WBA rules:​ “in order to give the Unified Champions a more flexible time to defend their titles as well as the challengers the chance to fight for the title.”​ ​ So while the very creation of the WBA’s split ‘super’ and ‘regular’ title system was frustrating in that it added yet another world title belt to the scene, at least the original intention here was (supposedly at least) simply a method from which unification bouts could happen more frequently, without the WBA champion having to fear being stripped of their hard-earned title.

For a number of years this continued to be the case, where the WBA would only recognise a fighter as a ‘super’ champion at a weight if that champion had indeed unified with either the WBC, IBF or WBO. Only this scenario would in turn make the WBA ‘regular’ title available and for that reason, the confusing nature of having two WBA champions at the same weight rarely reared its head throughout the 2000s, given the relative lack of unified champions within the sport. But fast-forward to the present day and, somewhere along the way, the WBA have begun recognising both ‘super’ and ‘regular’ champions at the same weight regardless of whether or not the ‘super’ champion is unified.

Dmitry Bivol, for example, is currently the WBA ‘super’ light heavyweight champion and is not unified, but there also exists the WBA ‘regular’ 175lb strap that Jean Pascal earned from Marcus Browne in August of last year. Callum Smith is the WBA ‘super’ super middleweight champion (the consecutive supers making that one extra confusing to decipher) and likewise remains un-unified; yet Canelo Alvarez, who incidentally ​is​ a unified champion at middleweight, is also the WBA ‘regular’ champ at 168lbs. The scenario also currently exists at welterweight, where Manny Pacquiao and Keith Thurman met last July in a supposed attempt to ‘unify’ the WBA regular and super titles at the weight, which should have meant following Pacquiao’s victory that the regular title was now redundant, but it instead became vacant and was recently picked up by Alexander Besputin. You can also find two separate, non-unified WBA ‘world champions’ at super featherweight and featherweight, meaning that there are currently five weight classes where the WBA has an extra world champion for no particular reason at all, other than to milk sanctioning fees for all they’re worth.

In addition to this, the WBA also sometimes recognise an interim champion and a WBA ‘gold’ champion (essentially another ‘interim’ belt allowing additional sanctioning fees to be collected alongside those for the actual interim title). At certain times there have been both two WBA ‘world’ champions and two WBA ‘interim world’ champions. I could go on, we could get into the WBA ‘international titles, but by this point you probably have a headache and you also get the picture; basically the WBA like creating ways to hand out new title belts and get paid for doing so.

Let’s call a WBA ‘regular’ champion for what they really are: effectively the sanctioning body’s number one contender but in the possession of a shiny belt that they’ve paid for handsomely. The WBA now seem intent on having two or more ‘champions’ at every weight, regardless of circumstance, meaning we now have at least five title belts on offer in all of the sports seventeen divisions. So that’ll be eighty-five potential ‘world title’ belts on offer at any given time.

No, wait, we haven’t even gotten onto the WBC yet, so there’s more. Much more.

When Manny Pacquiao bludgeoned Miguel Cotto to a twelfth round stoppage in November 2009, winning the WBO welterweight title in the process to notch his sixth world title across five weight classes, the WBC awarded the Filipino star the newly-created ‘diamond’ belt, which, as per the WBC’s website, was “created​ as an honorary championship exclusively to award the winner of a historic fight between two high-profile and elite boxers.”

This was in spite of the fact that Andre Berto reigned as WBC welterweight champion at the time and thus caused immediate confusion, but the WBC’s intention with the ‘diamond’ belt was simply to find a way to cash-in on the lucrative, high-profile bout between Pacquiao and Cotto. The belt has since been handed out for other particularly noteworthy bouts throughout the 2010s where the WBC title itself was not on the line, again allowing Mauricio Sulaiman and Co. a chance to get a piece of the pie.

The problem with the diamond belt is, especially for the more casual observer who may already be confused by the number of belts in the sport, the added uncertainty over who the real WBC champion is at any given time. ‘Diamond’ makes the belt sound more important than the actual WBC title itself, which isn’t the case. The ‘diamond’ titleholder and the actual WBC titleholder are never the same fighter also, so again, particularly for the layman, this creates the illusion that there are two WBC champions at every weight, just like the WBA.

And ever since the ‘diamond’ title came onto the scene, the WBC have got even more creative in churning out a variety of additional belts, just for fun (and sanctioning fees). ​In early 2010, the WBC created the ‘silver’ title, first won by featherweight Justin Savi and first thought to be a replacement to the WBC interim title. As it materialized however, the ‘silver’ title​ would exist alongside the interim belt somewhat akin to the WBA structure of (or lack of) intermediate belts. By the middle of the decade, the floodgates really opened and we saw WBC belts created for pretty much any scenario that they felt they could get away with.

The ‘emerald’ belt was commissioned to commemorate Pacquiao’s long awaited clash with Floyd Mayweather in 2015. The ‘money’ belt was at stake for the winner of Mayweather’s sideshow attraction against Conor McGregor in 2017. The WBC ‘Mayan’ title, made from ‘fossilised amber’ was then on offer for the winner of Canelo’s first fight with Gennady Golovkin in 2017, and was available again when Canelo decisioned Daniel Jacobs last May, this time the red-Mexican finally getting his hands on the oh so coveted trinket. Bizarrely, the WBC also gave a ‘Mayan’ belt to Tyson Fury for his decision win over Otto Wallin in September. The winner of Amir Khan’s bout with Neeraj Goyat last July was scheduled to win the newly-commissioned ‘pearl’ title, but I guess somewhat admirably the WBC actually withdrew this belt when the fight fell through and Khan went on to fight Billy Dib instead. The sanctioning body did however state that rather than the belt being scrapped, the pearl title would “​be reserved for another special occasion in the future.”

Then we get to the WBC ‘franchise’ champion. This, more than any amongst the plethora of titles above, simply reeks of both corruption and nonsense.

In June 2019, just a month after pocketing the fees for the ‘Mayan’ belt handed to Canelo for his win over Jacobs, the WBC announced the creation of a new ‘franchise’ champion, the status of which Canelo was elevated to with immediate effect. According to the WBC, the franchise champion was created so that a fighter “shall enjoy special status with respect to his or her mandatory obligations, holding multiple titles and competing for titles of other organisations, as the WBC board of governors rules on a case-by-case basis.”

Basically, for being a longtime favorite son of theirs, Canelo would remain in possession of a WBC title for as long as he chooses (pays sanctioning fees) without the need to ever defend said title against a mandatory challenger. In the meantime, the WBC would elevate another fighter to be the actual WBC champion at the weight, which in this case saw Jermall Charlo jump from ‘interim’ champion to become the WBC middleweight champion. In October, Vasyl Lomachenko was upgraded to ‘franchise’ champion at lightweight, with Devin Haney subsequently being moved up from his interim position to become WBC lightweight champion. The need for Haney to have shoulder surgery in December then led to the WBC naming him ‘champion in recess’ and ordering the number one and two contenders, Javier Fortuna and Luke Campbell, to fight for his vacant belt in the meantime (of course, the WBC aren’t going to let a potentially sidelined champion prevent them from cashing in on sanctioning fees).

The past decade has seen boxing’s title belt picture go from frustrating to outright shameless and as we enter the twenties, it’s hard to imagine things getting better, more than likely they will get worse. Fighters like belts, sanctioning bodies like money, and neither fact is going to change.

Billboard Left
Billboard Left
Read Also
Esteban de Jesus, Roberto Duran y AIDS (1972-89)
Many of us dream of celebrity sports fame, but only cruel individuals ...
Elmer Ray: The Humble Man of Hastings
"Men judge generally more by the eye than by the hand, for ...
SI Sportsbook Promo
Top 50 NBA players under 25 years old in 2021: Doncic bests Young
This year’s playoffs confirmed that the NBA is in good hands. The ...
Top 100 remaining 2021 NFL free agents after Day 1
This is the most up-to-date list of available NFL free agents following ...
Ranking the top 200 players in the NFL ahead of the 2021 season
This list isn’t based solely on performances from the 2020 NFL season. ...
Top 100 NFL free agents entering the 2021 offseason
Below is a list of the top 100 free agents available this ...
Ranking the 50 best current NBA players entering the 2020 season
Welcome to the third edition of my annual NBA top 50 player ...
Lady Tyger’s Tale: How Marian Trimiar Mauled the Boxing Establishment of the 1970s and 80s
To Feed the Ambition in Your Heart is Like Carrying a Tiger ...
The Best Player on Every NFL Team Entering the 2020 Season
Entering the past two seasons, I’ve given my picks for the best ...
Social Casino of the month
Stake.us - Sign up now! Sign up now!
Top Brands
Top Bonuses
Stake.us
Stake.us
Stake.us Review
97/100
BetRivers.net
BetRivers.net
BetRivers.net Review
96/100
Golden Hearts Games
Golden Hearts Games
Golden Hearts Games Review
95/100
LuckyLand Slots
LuckyLand Slots
LuckyLand Slots Review
94/100
Fortune Coins
Fortune Coins
Fortune Coins Review
92/100
Stake.us
Stake.us Bonus
5% Rakeback
T&Cs apply
9.7/10
BetRivers.net
BetRivers.net Bonus
Daily Rewards up to 10k VC$
T&Cs apply
9.6/10
Golden Hearts Games
Golden Hearts Games Bonus
Join GOLDEN2000 for 2,000 FREE coins
T&Cs apply
9.5/10
LuckyLand Slots
LuckyLand Slots Bonus
7,000 Gold Coins + 10 Sweeps Coins
T&Cs apply
9.4/10
Fortune Coins
Fortune Coins Bonus
140k GC + 400 FC
T&Cs apply
9.2/10
Latest News
Stake.us Unveils its New Streaming Platform Kick.com
The Stake.us new streaming platform – Kick.com – ...
Qatar 2022 Fifa World Cup Quarter-Finals: Netherlands vs Argentina
We have a world class clash this Friday ...
Long-shot David Avanesyan fights Terence Crawford Dec.10
The odds are long - 14-1. His two ...
Betting Tips
Our Latest YouTube Videos
Video: The Sports Zone: Top Sports News: Luke Fickell is gone, Bengals/Chiefs Preview and more
The Sports Zone: Top Sports News: Luke Fickell is gone, Bengals/Chiefs Preview and more
Video: The NFL Draft Show
The NFL Draft Show
Video: Froggy Talkin Sports W/Ryan & Joe
Froggy Talkin Sports W/Ryan & Joe
Sportsbook of the month
SI Sportsbook - Get your Free Bet now! Get your Free Bet now!
Find out what the legends have to say about sports this week....
Top Online Casinos
Top Casinos Bonuses
Stake.us
Stake.us
Stake.us Review
97/100
BetRivers.net
BetRivers.net
BetRivers.net Review
96/100
Golden Hearts Games
Golden Hearts Games
Golden Hearts Games Review
95/100
LuckyLand Slots
LuckyLand Slots
LuckyLand Slots Review
94/100
Fortune Coins
Fortune Coins
Fortune Coins Review
92/100
Stake.us
Stake.us Bonus
5% Rakeback
T&Cs apply
9.7/10
BetRivers.net
BetRivers.net Bonus
Daily Rewards up to 10k VC$
T&Cs apply
9.6/10
Golden Hearts Games
Golden Hearts Games Bonus
Join GOLDEN2000 for 2,000 FREE coins
T&Cs apply
9.5/10
LuckyLand Slots
LuckyLand Slots Bonus
7,000 Gold Coins + 10 Sweeps Coins
T&Cs apply
9.4/10
Fortune Coins
Fortune Coins Bonus
140k GC + 400 FC
T&Cs apply
9.2/10
Top Betting Sites
Top Betting Bonuses
SI Sportsbook
SI Sportsbook
SI Sportsbook Review
97/100
BetRivers.com
BetRivers.com
BetRivers.com Review
95/100
BetMGM
BetMGM
BetMGM Review
94/100
DraftKings
DraftKings
DraftKings Review
92/100
FanDuel
FanDuel
FanDuel Review
90/100
SI Sportsbook
SI Sportsbook Bonus
BET $20 GET $200 IN FREE BETS
T&Cs apply
9.7/10
First deposit only | 21+ & located in VA | Promo code as seen| A qualifying bet is $20 or more | Min odds of +120 or more | Free Bet Tokens credited after bet is settled and expire after 7 days | Free Bet stakes not included in winnings | Please Gamble Responsibly - Gambling Problem? VA: CALL 1-888-532-3500 | Full T&C apply
BetRivers.com
BetRivers.com Bonus
100% up to $500
T&Cs apply
9.5/10
BetMGM
BetMGM Bonus
100% up to $1000
T&Cs apply
9.4/10
DraftKings
DraftKings Bonus
20% up to $1000
T&Cs apply
9.2/10
FanDuel
FanDuel Bonus
$1000 No Sweat First Bet
T&Cs apply
9/10
Our Team
Mike GoodpasterAuthor IconJosh SchwartzSamuel TeetsMark Lewis
+6
Mike Goodpaster
Mike Goodpaster
Chief Editor
Author Icon
Christopher Carlson
Content Writer
Josh Schwartz
Josh Schwartz
Editor
Samuel Teets
Samuel Teets
US Sports Veteran
Mark Lewis
Mark Lewis
Editor
Simon Briffa
Simon Briffa
Sports Editor
Chris Benedict
Chris Benedict
Editor
Author Icon
Malik Zorrok
Author
John Raspanti
John Raspanti
Author
Brian Coburn
Brian Coburn
Author
Peter Bonahoom
Peter Bonahoom
Author
Find out what the legends have to say about sports this week....

If you enjoy hearing from the legends of pro sports, then be sure to tune into “The Grueling Truth” sports shows, “Where the legends speak”

Contact us: [email protected]

Players must be 21 years of age or older or reach the minimum age for gambling in their respective state and located in jurisdictions where online gambling is legal. Please play responsibly. Bet with your head, not over it. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, and wants help, call or visit: (a) the Council on Compulsive Gambling of New Jersey at 1-800-Gambler or www.800gambler.org; or (b) Gamblers Anonymous at 855-2-CALL-GA or www.gamblersanonymous.org.

Trading financial products carries a high risk to your capital, especially trading leverage products such as CFDs. CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

This site is using Cloudflare and adheres to the Google Safe Browsing Program. We adapted Google's Privacy Guidelines to keep your data safe at all times.

ccww
Move to Top
Close
Our Sports Pros recommend these awesome Social Casino sites this week:
×
Your Bonus Code:
The bonus offer of was already opened in an additional window. If not, you can open it also by clicking the following link:
Visit Site